-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 714
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cmd/bpf2go: fix s390x target #1312
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
examples/uretprobe/bpf_bpfel_x86.go → examples/uretprobe/bpf_x86_bpfel.go
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
File renamed without changes.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With
tgt.clang
filling in the_GOARCH
value #1307 will not be resolved.While
go tool dist list
does not lists390
as supported architecture, internals of Go still ares390
aware and make a difference betweens390
ands390x
.As
tgt.clang
should bes390
at this point, it will generate a file with the according name and Gos build constraints will not consider it fors390x
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, clang target is only ever
bpfel
orbpfeb
. This will break if we ever need to support clang targets other than those two which then end up matching go constraints, but why would we?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
List of clang targets:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry for coming back on this just now.
I tested this PR again with the issue described in #1307. And I think, I now also got the origin of my confusion. As I tested this PR with code with the linked repository from #1307, I did not clean up the and removed the checked-in compiled binary objects. So I ended up with a strange mix that led to my confusion.
Testing it again now, I can confirm, that this PR works as intended.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@msherif1234 I tested this PR by checking out this PR, compiling bpf2go and replace the bpfgo in the generate instruction in https://github.com/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent/blob/504add4c32d1259afabe2d2ab24664a684109d5c/pkg/ebpf/tracer.go#L29 with the compiled version from this PR