Merge pull request #6409 from lydia-duncan/testRecordArgument

Add a test of declaring an argument with a generic record instantiation [tests, not reviewed] Realized I had covered this for the class case but not the record case. Passed with a clean checkout
chapel-lang · Jun 7, 2017 · 45c35d2 · 45c35d2
2 parents 38e30b0 + 4150f6f
commit 45c35d2
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 21 additions and 0 deletions.
diff --git a/test/classes/initializers/records/generics/argument_type.chpl b/test/classes/initializers/records/generics/argument_type.chpl
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// Checks the behavior for declaring an argument with the type desired
+record Foo {
+  type t;
+  var x;
+
+  proc init(xVal) {
+    t = xVal.type;
+    x = xVal;
+    super.init();
+  }
+}
+
+proc takesAFoo(val: Foo(int, int)) {
+  writeln(val);
+  writeln(val.type: string);
+}
+
+var f = new Foo(10);
+takesAFoo(f);
diff --git a/test/classes/initializers/records/generics/argument_type.good b/test/classes/initializers/records/generics/argument_type.good
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+(x = 10)
+Foo(int(64),int(64))