This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 14, 2023. It is now read-only.
Clean up authentication manager to expose a signal-based API #1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@cdzombak, this is in response to some concerns we discussed about the “callback-hell” nature of
CDZGithubAuthManager
.I think the callback-hell and approachability of the code derives from the fact that the method returns
void
. The method is an accessor of sorts – we simply want an authenticatedOCTClient
. Unfortunately, without raising our level of abstraction we have to resort to a callback block, despite our language actually having a notion of return types.So, starting from the interface, let's restructure the method like so:
Now client code could bind to that change over time. It looks like you create a
CDZIssuesSyncEngine
from authenticated clients, so you could make that relationship explicit with something like this:It's a somewhat trivial example. but the goal is to declare these functional relationships as opposed to imperatively writing code within callbacks.
I could walk through some of the changes or you could ping me with questions in-line.