Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade iso-639-1 from 2.1.9 to 2.1.15 #1243

Merged

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade iso-639-1 from 2.1.9 to 2.1.15.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 6 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2022-06-10.

The recommended version fixes:

Severity Issue PriorityScore (*) Exploit Maturity
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-MOMENT-2944238
768/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade iso-639-1 from 2.1.9 to 2.1.15.

See this package in npm:


See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/cboard/project/d8988709-12b3-418a-b44c-fca27f9b400c?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@martinbedouret martinbedouret merged commit 62ea7a8 into master Jul 15, 2022
@martinbedouret martinbedouret deleted the snyk-upgrade-e8a6d486512efb1f0bd4fe821d50eeae branch October 27, 2022 03:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants