Use ndx-pose>=0.2 for DeepLabCutInterface and LightningPoseDataInterface

[h-mayorquin]

This uses the latest release of ndx-pose and modifies the DeepLabCutInterface class to use the latest API (e.g. Skeletons instead of nodes).

This is related to both:
#1114
and
#1127

[pauladkisson]

@h-mayorquin, are there any blockers on this? Having this done will help me ensure that the dev tests are fixed properly.

[h-mayorquin]

We are waiting for sleap.io to review the PR:

talmolab/sleap-io#143

If having this would make your life easier I propose

• You can update LightningPose and upgrade it.
• Then I can modify the CI so we test sleap interface as a stand-alone test while the PR above gets merged.

Or if you have another proposal I am all ears.

[pauladkisson]

We are waiting for sleap.io to review the PR:

I'm a tad confused bc this PR updates DLC and LightningPose but not sleap.

But in general I am in favor of merging what we can, updating the CLI to isolate SLEAP and then we can re-integrate it once the PR is reviewed.

[h-mayorquin]

I'm a tad confused bc this PR updates DLC and LightningPose but not sleep.

The PR does not update the code of LightingPos only the one of DLC.

• The code of LightningPose needs to be updated
• We need the upstream changes on sleep but for that, we can adjust on the CI temporary.

[pauladkisson]

The PR does not update the code of LightingPos only the one of DLC.

Ah, I see. You're just resolving dependency conflicts with LightningPose.

Well, even better. We can update DLC in this PR and then LightningPose in the next, adding the appropriate skipifs. Then when all the ndx-pose interfaces are updated we can re-integrate the CI.

[h-mayorquin]

Yeah, that makes sense to me.

Can you review #1158? I want to merge that one then do a release. I want to do a release before merging this PR and the one in #1153 as they are both large changes on behavior.

[talmo]

talmolab/sleap-io#143 merged!

Will ping when we cut a new release.

[h-mayorquin]

Thanks a lot @talmo !

[h-mayorquin]

I created a new file with only the pose estimation interfaces.

[pauladkisson]

A few small suggestions, but otherwise looks good!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 73.77049% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.64%. Comparing base (96dfdff) to head (ee83879).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...atainterfaces/behavior/sleap/sleapdatainterface.py	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...v/datainterfaces/behavior/deeplabcut/_dlc_utils.py	80.76%	5 Missing ⚠️
...havior/lightningpose/lightningposedatainterface.py	80.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...ces/behavior/deeplabcut/deeplabcutdatainterface.py	88.88%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1128      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.69%   89.64%   -1.05%     
==========================================
  Files         129      129              
  Lines        8189     8345     +156     
==========================================
+ Hits         7427     7481      +54     
- Misses        762      864     +102     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	89.64% <73.77%> (-1.05%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/neuroconv/basedatainterface.py	87.05% <ø> (-8.30%)	⬇️
...ces/behavior/deeplabcut/deeplabcutdatainterface.py	92.45% <88.88%> (-1.03%)	⬇️
...havior/lightningpose/lightningposedatainterface.py	92.80% <80.00%> (-2.58%)	⬇️
...v/datainterfaces/behavior/deeplabcut/_dlc_utils.py	61.01% <80.76%> (+2.12%)	⬆️
...atainterfaces/behavior/sleap/sleapdatainterface.py	40.38% <0.00%> (-55.27%)	⬇️

... and 19 files with indirect coverage changes