Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(./src/util/util.ts): fixed unwanted replacement of .r in evals #439

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2023

Conversation

johnsonjo4531
Copy link
Contributor

@johnsonjo4531 johnsonjo4531 commented Mar 11, 2023

Fix: #438

Fixed unwanted replacement of r. in evals according to issue #438 (e.g. r.obj.owner.id wrongly becoming r_obj.owner_id instead of the correct r_obj.owner.id)

…cording to issue casbin#438

Fixed unwanted replacement of r. in evals according to issue casbin#438 (e.g. r.obj.owner.id wrongly
becoming r_obj.owner_id instead of the correct r_obj.owner.id)

fix casbin#438
@casbin-bot
Copy link
Member

@nodece @Zxilly @Shivansh-yadav13 please review

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 11, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@johnsonjo4531
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just want to make sure I include the main maintainer of node-casbin as well, so he can take a look: @hsluoyz

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4394730534

  • 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 77.68%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 4322094925: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1510
Relevant Lines: 1853

💛 - Coveralls

@hsluoyz hsluoyz merged commit 39878be into casbin:master Mar 12, 2023
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2023
## [5.24.4](v5.24.3...v5.24.4) (2023-03-12)

### Bug Fixes

* **./src/util/util.ts:** fixed unwanted replacement of .r in evals according to issue [#438](#438) ([#439](#439)) ([39878be](39878be))
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.24.4 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Chaining on nested struct / object fields in ABAC policy
5 participants