Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Canonicalize away bit width and embed small integers into
IntId
s #4487Canonicalize away bit width and embed small integers into
IntId
s #4487Changes from 1 commit
6d73339
5b79952
ebc1f06
b827f5b
2e1d1f6
f17a1ca
cdc6020
136d10d
0ae1295
ff3c7dd
537ae2e
a206dfe
ddf3fa1
657d212
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Organizationally, do you think it'd help if we had toolchain/base/int.h with both IntStore and IntId? We do somewhat similar in sem_ir, with things like type.h (just noting that one since it's in the PR)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SGTM. I'll do the rename from
int_store.h
toint.h
last to preserve review threads as much as I can.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're currently using
LLVM_LIKELY
/LLVM_UNLIKELY
, is this equivalent? Are you proposing to switch given the attribute is available?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just noticed that we have standard attributes now. Happy to either switch to LLVM ones until we can move the rest of the code, or move the rest of the code in a follow-up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My thought is we've generally agreed to use C++ attribute forms so that seems the better choice. I don't think it makes sense to switch this code if the rest changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will do.