Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update charm libraries #248

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update charm libraries #248

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

addyess
Copy link
Contributor

@addyess addyess commented Jan 15, 2025

Automated action to fetch latest version of charm libraries. The branch of this PR
will be wiped during the next check. Unless you really know what you're doing, you
most likely don't want to push any commits to this branch.

@addyess addyess requested a review from a team as a code owner January 15, 2025 01:30
Copy link
Contributor

@HomayoonAlimohammadi HomayoonAlimohammadi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work, thanks a lot @addyess! Left some minor comments and questions.

@addyess addyess force-pushed the chore/auto-libs branch 7 times, most recently from b985c00 to 91809c6 Compare January 23, 2025 01:29
@addyess addyess force-pushed the chore/auto-libs branch 3 times, most recently from 8fc03f7 to 9139b7e Compare January 26, 2025 01:29
@addyess
Copy link
Contributor Author

addyess commented Jan 27, 2025

hey @HomayoonAlimohammadi would you put an approval on this since you've looked at it. It's an automation but currently needs a +1 from someone other than me

@addyess addyess force-pushed the chore/auto-libs branch 3 times, most recently from bfaa4de to 5ccbfd7 Compare January 29, 2025 01:30
Copy link
Contributor

Test coverage for 905b7c2

coverage-report: install_deps /home/runner/work/k8s-operator/k8s-operator/charms/worker/k8s> /home/runner/.local/share/uv/tools/tox/bin/uv pip install 'coverage[toml]'
coverage-report: commands[0] /home/runner/work/k8s-operator/k8s-operator/charms/worker/k8s> coverage report
Name                                    Stmts   Miss  Cover
-----------------------------------------------------------
lib/charms/k8s/v0/k8sd_api_manager.py     311     29    91%
src/charm.py                              580    307    47%
src/cloud_integration.py                   80      3    96%
src/config/extra_args.py                   31      2    94%
src/containerd.py                         140     22    84%
src/cos_integration.py                     33     12    64%
src/endpoints.py                           40      1    98%
src/events/update_status.py                68     24    65%
src/inspector.py                           41      4    90%
src/kube_control.py                        44     32    27%
src/literals.py                            34      0   100%
src/pki.py                                 33      7    79%
src/protocols.py                           28      5    82%
src/reschedule.py                          77      4    95%
src/snap.py                               193     29    85%
src/token_distributor.py                  181    109    40%
src/upgrade.py                            108     48    56%
-----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                                    2022    638    68%
coverage-report: OK (0.31=setup[0.03]+cmd[0.29] seconds)
congratulations :) (0.37 seconds)

Static code analysis report

Run started:2025-01-30 01:30:31.340327

Test results:
  No issues identified.

Code scanned:
  Total lines of code: 4213
  Total lines skipped (#nosec): 3
  Total potential issues skipped due to specifically being disabled (e.g., #nosec BXXX): 0

Run metrics:
  Total issues (by severity):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
  Total issues (by confidence):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
Files skipped (0):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants