Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use GitHub teams as code owners #6114

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2023

Conversation

jameysharp
Copy link
Contributor

The teams named in this revised version of the CODEOWNERS file are currently configured with the same members as are listed in the file now.

We wanted a single member of the selected team to be assigned as a reviewer, but listing people explicitly in CODEOWNERS causes all the named people to be assigned. Using teams instead allows us to configure the load-balancing policy.

This also will allow us to add and remove reviewers without needing a PR every time.

The teams named in this revised version of the `CODEOWNERS` file are
currently configured with the same members as are listed in the file
now.

We wanted a single member of the selected team to be assigned as a
reviewer, but listing people explicitly in CODEOWNERS causes all the
named people to be assigned. Using teams instead allows us to configure
the load-balancing policy.

This also will allow us to add and remove reviewers without needing a PR
every time.
@jameysharp jameysharp added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 28, 2023
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit 01b82ad Mar 28, 2023
@jameysharp jameysharp deleted the codeowners-teams branch March 28, 2023 23:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants