Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 11, 2019. It is now read-only.

Support configuring Tor pluggable transports #12989

Closed
riastradh-brave opened this issue Feb 2, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Support configuring Tor pluggable transports #12989

riastradh-brave opened this issue Feb 2, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
design A design change, especially one which needs input from the design team. feature/tor open-in-brave-core

Comments

@riastradh-brave
Copy link
Contributor

We should (eventually) support letting users configure Tor bridges for connection to the Tor network.

@mrphs
Copy link

mrphs commented Jul 3, 2018

I'd say it's much better if you could include Pluggable Transports instead of vanilla bridges, as the vanilla bridges aren't much of a use in the current state of internet censorship in the world.

@riastradh-brave riastradh-brave changed the title Support configuring Tor bridges Support configuring Tor pluggable transports Jul 3, 2018
@ahmetasabanci
Copy link

I think this would be really useful for people living places like Turkey (like me) and others which censor Tor. Being able to use Tor just opening another tab instead of using another browser would be really useful and help people to both avoid censorship and surveillance.

@srirambv
Copy link
Collaborator

+1 from https://community.brave.com/t/change-port-from-9050/27530 for configurable ports

@riastradh-brave
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI, this issue is about configuring how Brave, via the tor daemon, can reach the Tor network over the internet. The issue in https://community.brave.com/t/change-port-from-9050/27530 is about how the Brave process on your computer talks to the tor daemon process also on your computer.

@tildelowengrimm
Copy link

Made the leap: brave/brave-browser#1138

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
design A design change, especially one which needs input from the design team. feature/tor open-in-brave-core
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants