Refactor Brave Ads to reduce tight coupling

[tmancey]

Resolves brave/brave-browser#12558

Submitter Checklist:

• Submitted a ticket for my issue if one did not already exist.
• Used Github auto-closing keywords in the commit message.
• Added/updated tests for this change (for new code or code which already has tests).
• Verified that these changes build without errors on
  • Android
  • iOS
  • Linux
  • macOS
  • Windows
• Verified that these changes pass automated tests (unit, browser, security tests) on
  • iOS
  • Linux
  • macOS
  • Windows
• Verified that all lint errors/warnings are resolved (npm run lint, npm run gn_check)
• Ran git rebase master (if needed).
• Ran git rebase -i to squash commits (if needed).
• Tagged reviewers and labelled the pull request as needed.
• Requested a security/privacy review as needed.
• Added appropriate QA labels (QA/Yes or QA/No) to the associated issue
• Added appropriate release note labels (release-notes/include or release-notes/exclude) to the associated issue
• Public documentation has been updated as necessary. For instance:
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Deviations-from-Chromium-(features-we-disable-or-remove)
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Proxy-redirected-URLs
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Fingerprinting-Protections
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Brave%E2%80%99s-Use-of-Referral-Codes
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Custom-Headers
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Web-compatibility-issues-with-tracking-protection
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/QA-Guide

Test Plan:

Reviewer Checklist:

• New files have MPL-2.0 license header.
• Request a security/privacy review as needed.
• Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
• Verify test plan is specified in PR before merging to source

After-merge Checklist:

• The associated issue milestone is set to the smallest version that the
  changes has landed on.
• All relevant documentation has been updated.

[moritzhaller]

as discussed on screen share - LGTM!

[tmancey]

Restarting CI for all platforms as previously Android was failing. After further investigation, this was due to two of the unit tests having the same test suite name. This was only an issue on Android.

[tmancey]

CI failed for known rewards tests