We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Found while testing #43213
dragging an existing tab on the tab bar will also drag a split view if the Split view is present before or after the tab
1.77.54 CR134
dragging an existing tab that is present before or after the split view should only drag and drop the tab not the split view
Easily reproduced
cc: @brave/qa-team @rebron @simonhong @emerick
Thread for more details https://bravesoftware.slack.com/archives/CKNHM4RTK/p1740141588729229?thread_ts=1739912894.037299&cid=CKNHM4RTK
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reproduced on
Brave | 1.76.68 Chromium: 134.0.6998.24 (Official Build) beta (arm64) -- | -- Revision | eac610699a3bf7c2506522bc0603b1a97a6324a6 OS | macOS Version 15.3.1 (Build 24D70)
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Description
Found while testing #43213
dragging an existing tab on the tab bar will also drag a split view if the Split view is present before or after the tab
Steps to reproduce
1.77.54 CR134
Actual result
dragging an existing tab on the tab bar will also drag a split view if the Split view is present before or after the tab
Expected result
dragging an existing tab that is present before or after the split view should only drag and drop the tab not the split view
Reproduces how often
Easily reproduced
Brave version (brave://version info)
Channel information
Reproducibility
Miscellaneous information
cc: @brave/qa-team @rebron @simonhong @emerick
Thread for more details https://bravesoftware.slack.com/archives/CKNHM4RTK/p1740141588729229?thread_ts=1739912894.037299&cid=CKNHM4RTK
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: