-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CLOSED] For #6093: Added button to show all results in a list #5567
Comments
Comment by TomMalbran Nice feature. The new button might need to be put in another place if something like this is done in the Find/Replace UI Cleanup card, and I might also just call it "Find All". But To Show the status bar, try calling I am not sure why the busy indicator is not hiding, since it should hide it after the search is done. |
Comment by MarcelGerber
|
Comment by MarcelGerber
|
Comment by TomMalbran I wouldn't add this to Find/Replace. I think this could go in Find in Files, by changing the |
Comment by MarcelGerber But it seems illogical to do |
Comment by redmunds
|
Comment by TomMalbran
|
Comment by larz0 Just make the find-result at the end of the find input a blue "link" that opens up the bottom panel. This will reduce clutter and it also gives context. Would be nice to be able to tab to it as well. |
Comment by redmunds I'd like an option to "Find in Working Set Files" |
Comment by MarcelGerber
|
Comment by TomMalbran I had a Find in Working Set Files command implemented in #3151. So I should get to it in one of the next Find in Files Improvements iteration. But instead of just a command, I thought it might be nice to be able to change the scope inside the find in files bar too. |
Comment by MarcelGerber Yes, that's a good idea and the way Visual Studio (2013) does it: |
Comment by larz0
|
Comment by MarcelGerber Just pushed a commit (sorry, the old ones got lost) to make this PR up-to-date. |
Comment by MarcelGerber Another not-so-cool thing: The same search is done twice. Would be better to just pass the results to fill the list. |
Comment by larz0
|
Comment by TomMalbran If it will be just a link on the search numbers, I would add it to replace too.
BTW, I think we should also increase the maximum number of results from a single file, which is hardcoded at 300. |
Comment by larz0 Yes. All search numbers should be clickable.
|
Comment by TomMalbran
|
Comment by larz0
|
Comment by MarcelGerber Next commit online. |
Comment by TomMalbran
If not, the bars would look similar, but not exactly the same. Since the modalbar closes after doing the search, the arrows are not required, and the replace buttons would be just one, which means that there might be extra space for the scope and filters dropdowns. |
Comment by larz0 Sounds good. Not one command for all three but just the same Replace UI with the filter instead of the arrows. |
Comment by TomMalbran I am not sure, might look weird to have it in the history popdown. There is also the Find In... that shows the scope next to the search input. Maybe we could place this in the space used to show the results count inside the input? |
Comment by larz0 Hmm I'll need to think about that a bit more. It could be hard to scale. |
Comment by MarcelGerber
Replace |
Comment by larz0
|
Comment by MarcelGerber I were just about to make this change ;) |
Comment by larz0 w00T! |
Comment by TomMalbran I know, but it will need to be cut at some point, or the filters dropdown will end up not being visible in not too wide screens. It will get even worst when adding the replace input and button. We can just show the entire text when opening the dropdown. We could also not add the replace input in the modal bar, and just add it in the find in files results, to have more space. |
Issue by MarcelGerber
Sunday Nov 24, 2013 at 18:51 GMT
Originally opened as adobe/brackets#6099
This PR adds a button to show all results in a list, as requested in #6093.
Including:
@
peterflynnMarcelGerber included the following code: https://github.com/adobe/brackets/pull/6099/commits
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: