Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve portfolio history #5315

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 16, 2021

Conversation

chimp1984
Copy link
Contributor

  • Improve csv export
  • Fix incorrect taker miner fee
  • Add summary windows for trade history

Remove @NotNull annotation (unnecessary verbose, default is non null, if null then we annotate with @nullable)
Separate volume with currency (add new column for currency)
Separate trade fee in btc and bsq, remove currency from value
Replace "-" with empty string

Improve detection of bsq fee tx. Previous version was more complicate
and would not have covered case where BSQ fee input matches exactly
required fee so not BSQ output would have been created.
We had only displayed the fee for 1 tx, but taker pays 3 times that fee.
The real miner fee is a bit higher in case we used BSQ as we add the
burned BSQ to miner fee, we ignore that small difference as it would
add more complexity and for that use case it't not that important to
be exact.
We need to use fee from trade not from offer
@chimp1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

Screenshot 2021-03-15 at 16 29 31

Screenshot 2021-03-15 at 16 29 43

Copy link
Contributor

@ripcurlx ripcurlx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK - will look at it into more detail during release testing

@ripcurlx ripcurlx merged commit 64ab053 into bisq-network:master Mar 16, 2021
@ripcurlx ripcurlx added this to the v1.6.0 milestone Mar 16, 2021
@Conza88
Copy link

Conza88 commented Mar 16, 2021

No % of trade deviation in history? e.g. -3% etc.

@chimp1984 chimp1984 deleted the improve-portfolio-history branch November 18, 2021 00:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants