Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update for bdg-formats code style changes #1126

Conversation

heuermh
Copy link
Member

@heuermh heuermh commented Aug 24, 2016

No description provided.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

LGTM! Can you resolve the conflicts?

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 24, 2016

Don't see why there would be any.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/1414/

Build result: FAILURE

GitHub pull request #1126 of commit 43bd039.Notifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.Building remotely on amp-jenkins-worker-05 (centos spark-test) in workspace /home/jenkins/workspace/ADAM-prb > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=10Fetching changes from the remote Git repository > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git config remote.origin.url https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git # timeout=10Fetching upstream changes from https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git --version # timeout=10 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git -c core.askpass=true fetch --tags --progress https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git +refs/pull/:refs/remotes/origin/pr/ # timeout=15 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git rev-parse 43bd039^{commit} # timeout=10 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git branch -a --contains 43bd039 # timeout=10 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git rev-parse remotes/origin/pr/1126/head^{commit} # timeout=10Checking out Revision 43bd039 (origin/pr/1126/head) > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git checkout -f 43bd039b3b86d08e15e378e1335b72a0fb40ae14First time build. Skipping changelog.Triggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.5.2,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.5.2,centosTouchstone configurations resulted in FAILURE, so aborting...Notifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'
Test FAILed.

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 24, 2016

Oh wait, there's a commit on the feature branch I didn't see before, d86f258. That won't work since bdg-formats HEAD builds as 0.9.1-SNAPSHOT.

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 24, 2016

GIt can't seem to infer what I want to do when I use commands incorrectly

$ git rebase -i upstream/upgrade-to-bdg-formats-0.10.0
fatal: Needed a single revision
invalid upstream upstream/upgrade-to-bdg-formats-0.10.0

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 24, 2016

That means I'm git stuck. 😦 Please advise.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

Did you do git fetch upstream? What happens if you do git checkout upstream/upgrade-to-bdg-formats-0.10.0?

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 24, 2016

Nope. Not realizing there were any commits on upgrade-to-bdg-formats-0.10.0 I branched from master.

@heuermh heuermh force-pushed the formats-issue-100 branch from 43bd039 to bf886c9 Compare August 24, 2016 23:40
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/1417/

Build result: FAILURE

GitHub pull request #1126 of commit bf886c9 automatically merged.Notifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.Building remotely on amp-jenkins-worker-05 (centos spark-test) in workspace /home/jenkins/workspace/ADAM-prb > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=10Fetching changes from the remote Git repository > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git config remote.origin.url https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git # timeout=10Fetching upstream changes from https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git --version # timeout=10 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git -c core.askpass=true fetch --tags --progress https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git +refs/pull/:refs/remotes/origin/pr/ # timeout=15 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git rev-parse origin/pr/1126/merge^{commit} # timeout=10 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git branch -a --contains fb78db3 # timeout=10 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git rev-parse remotes/origin/pr/1126/merge^{commit} # timeout=10Checking out Revision fb78db3 (origin/pr/1126/merge) > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git checkout -f fb78db388ecbe43062fc423cab713ebf46296adeFirst time build. Skipping changelog.Triggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.5.2,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.5.2,centosTouchstone configurations resulted in FAILURE, so aborting...Notifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'
Test FAILed.

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 25, 2016

Jenkins isn't getting the latest bdg-formats snapshot build. Do I have to mvn deploy a snapshot manually or is Jenkins supposed to be taking care of that automatically?

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

Jenkins isn't getting the latest bdg-formats snapshot build. Do I have to mvn deploy a snapshot manually or is Jenkins supposed to be taking care of that automatically?

Jenkins did get the latest bdg-formats snapshot. However! What Jenkins did not do, was build and deploy the snapshot after the last bdg-formats commit was pushed. There was an issue with the refspec for the bdg-formats master branch that caused the git polling hook to fail. The polling hook should run in 10 minutes; I'll trigger this build once Jenkins has pushed the bdg-formats snapshot.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

Jenkins, test this please.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/1418/

Build result: FAILURE

[...truncated 24 lines...]Triggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.4.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.5.2,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.4.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.3.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.3.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.5.2,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.6.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.4.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.6.1,centosADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.4.1,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.4.1,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.5.2,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.5.2,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.6.1,centos completed with result FAILURENotifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'
Test FAILed.

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 25, 2016

Thanks. I'm not sure how to interpret the latest build matrix -- only some of the Jenkins build configurations got the right snapshot version?

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 25, 2016

Jenkins, retest this please.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/1419/

Build result: FAILURE

[...truncated 24 lines...]Triggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.4.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.5.2,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.4.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.3.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.3.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.5.2,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.6.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.4.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.6.1,centosADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.5.2,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.5.2,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.6.1,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.4.1,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSNotifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'
Test FAILed.

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 25, 2016

Jenkins, test this please.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/1423/
Test PASSed.

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 25, 2016

Woot!

@jpdna
Copy link
Member

jpdna commented Aug 26, 2016

LGTM - is this ready to merge?

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 26, 2016

is this ready to merge?

Yes, please

@fnothaft fnothaft merged commit 65adcf6 into bigdatagenomics:upgrade-to-bdg-formats-0.10.0 Aug 26, 2016
@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

Thanks @heuermh! For these PRs against the topic branch, I'm just going to use the green merge button, since we'll eventually need to sort out the topic branch itself.

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 26, 2016

Thanks!

@heuermh heuermh deleted the formats-issue-100 branch August 26, 2016 16:35
@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Aug 26, 2016

As far as topic branching goes, should I be merging commits from master here or will we resolve all of those when merging the topic branch?

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

I'm thinking that we should periodically rebase the 0.10.0 branch on master. To make it easier to tell when we've got a merge conflict, perhaps we should PR 0.10.0 against master? This way, we'll get a CI build whenever we push an update, and GitHub will tell us whenever we're out of date.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

Opened #1135.

heuermh added a commit to heuermh/adam that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2016
fnothaft pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2016
* Update for bdg-formats code style changes (#1126)
* Remove StructuralVariant and StructuralVariantType, add names field to Variant
* Merge VariantAnnotation and DatabaseVariantAnnotation records
* Implement separate variant and genotype filters; rename VariantContext.databases field
fnothaft pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2016
* Update for bdg-formats code style changes (#1126)
* Remove StructuralVariant and StructuralVariantType, add names field to Variant
* Merge VariantAnnotation and DatabaseVariantAnnotation records
* Implement separate variant and genotype filters; rename VariantContext.databases field
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants