Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 6, 2024. It is now read-only.

Fix file reference to rules_docker #118

Merged

Conversation

ash2k
Copy link

@ash2k ash2k commented Mar 2, 2018

The file was renamed in bazelbuild/rules_docker#279.

@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. t looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify it.


What to do if you already signed the CLA

Individual signers
Corporate signers
  • Your company has a Point of Contact who decides which employees are authorized to participate. Ask your POC to be added to the group of authorized contributors. If you don't know who your Point of Contact is, direct the project maintainer to go/cla#troubleshoot.
  • The email used to register you as an authorized contributor must be the email used for the Git commit. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • The email used to register you as an authorized contributor must also be attached to your GitHub account.

@ash2k ash2k force-pushed the fix-rules-docker-dep branch from a0fb4d0 to 96f4818 Compare March 2, 2018 09:43
@ash2k
Copy link
Author

ash2k commented Mar 6, 2018

CLA should be fine now, please check.

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

@mattmoor mattmoor changed the base branch from master to update-rules-docker March 6, 2018 03:03
@mattmoor mattmoor merged commit 6378fe2 into bazelbuild:update-rules-docker Mar 6, 2018
@ash2k ash2k deleted the fix-rules-docker-dep branch May 30, 2018 11:34
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants