Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Gru Tester] Add unit test for src/vanilla/utils/atomWithObservable.ts #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: gru-unit-test
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gru-bot
Copy link

@gru-bot gru-bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Score (skipped)

0

Source Code

Link

Value & Challenge

Field Level
topValue Critical
bottomValue Critical
topChallenge Challenging
bottomChallenge Challenging
Value Detail
atomWithObservable:
  value: Critical
  reason: This function is responsible for creating atoms that manage observable data, involving complex logic with subscriptions, error handling, and asynchronous state management. Errors could lead to data inconsistencies or system crashes. It is highly worth unit testing due to its core functionality and high dependency.
Challenge Detail
atomWithObservable:
  challenge: Challenging
  reason: The function contains complex logic with multiple conditional branches and nested structures. It handles both synchronous and asynchronous data flows, involves complex exception handling, and requires mocking of observable patterns.

Coverage

The change in coverage value, such as: 0% -> 50%, indicates that the coverage was 0% before writing the tests and 50% after writing them.

https://web.dev/articles/ta-code-coverage

Type Change
lines
statements
branches
functions

Langsmith Link

Link

Step writeAndRunTest Overview

Index Pre Passed Test Passed Post Passed
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Last Model Result

Pre

Exec

npx vitest run /jotai/src/vanilla/utils/atomWithObservable.gru.test.ts (0)
�[33mThe CJS build of Vite's Node API is deprecated. See https://vitejs.dev/guide/troubleshooting.html#vite-cjs-node-api-deprecated for more details.�[39m

 RUN  v2.1.1 /jotai

 ✓ |jotai| src/vanilla/utils/atomWithObservable.gru.test.ts  (3 tests) 14ms

 Test Files  1 passed (1)
      Tests  3 passed (3)
   Start at  13:15:32
   Duration  2.19s (transform 418ms, setup 0ms, collect 390ms, tests 14ms, environment 572ms, prepare 165ms)

Post

pnpm test:format (0)
> jotai@2.10.0 test:format /jotai
> prettier '*.{js,json,md}' '{src,tests,benchmarks,docs}/**/*.{ts,tsx,md,mdx}' --list-different

pnpm test:types (0)
> jotai@2.10.0 test:types /jotai
> tsc --noEmit

pnpm test:lint (0)
> jotai@2.10.0 test:lint /jotai
> eslint --no-eslintrc --c .eslintrc.json '*.{js,ts}' '{src,tests,benchmarks}/**/*.{ts,tsx}'

Comment on lines +41 to +42
mockSubject.next('test')
expect(mockSubject.next).toHaveBeenCalledWith('test')
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

这里的断言有点问题,看上去是有点多余的,势必会为 true。

@vangie vangie added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Sep 27, 2024
@vangie
Copy link

vangie commented Sep 27, 2024

这个测试写得不够好,原始文件也非常复杂,看上去 Agent 没有理解透彻。

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants