Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(io): remove intersection interfaces #518

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025
Merged

refactor(io): remove intersection interfaces #518

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

azjezz
Copy link
Owner

@azjezz azjezz commented Mar 4, 2025

No description provided.

@azjezz azjezz marked this pull request as draft March 4, 2025 21:35
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 4, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 13666823521

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.04%) to 98.505%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 13662859963: 0.04%
Covered Lines: 5470
Relevant Lines: 5553

💛 - Coveralls

@azjezz azjezz added Priority: High After critical issues are fixed, these should be dealt with before any further issues. Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed by the requestor out of politeness Type: Maintenance Updating phrasing or wording to make things clearer or removing ambiguity Type: BC Break A change that will result in a backward compatibility break in the public API. labels Mar 5, 2025
@azjezz azjezz marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2025 01:54
Signed-off-by: azjezz <azjezz@protonmail.com>
@azjezz azjezz merged commit f81a0c6 into next Mar 5, 2025
28 checks passed
@azjezz azjezz deleted the refactor/io branch March 5, 2025 02:04
devnix pushed a commit to devnix/psl that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2025
Signed-off-by: azjezz <azjezz@protonmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority: High After critical issues are fixed, these should be dealt with before any further issues. Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed by the requestor out of politeness Type: BC Break A change that will result in a backward compatibility break in the public API. Type: Maintenance Updating phrasing or wording to make things clearer or removing ambiguity
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants