Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use RAND_bytes instead of rand for ICE uFrag/uPwd generation #10

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2019
Merged

Use RAND_bytes instead of rand for ICE uFrag/uPwd generation #10

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2019

Conversation

Sean-Der
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 27, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #10 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #10      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   19.17%   19.16%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          30       30              
  Lines        6738     6741       +3     
==========================================
  Hits         1292     1292              
- Misses       5446     5449       +3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/source/PeerConnection/PeerConnection.c 2.58% <0%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 22d7d31...8b6114b. Read the comment docs.

@Sean-Der Sean-Der force-pushed the openssl-rand-generation branch from 1c616ad to 8b6114b Compare November 27, 2019 22:50
@Sean-Der Sean-Der merged commit 6df1e64 into master Nov 27, 2019
@Sean-Der Sean-Der deleted the openssl-rand-generation branch November 27, 2019 23:01
@zhuker zhuker mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2020
Merged
@shiv50084 shiv50084 mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2020
Closed
@liutuzhao liutuzhao mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2020
Closed
@shiv50084 shiv50084 mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2020
Closed
@YOSI-yoshidayuji YOSI-yoshidayuji mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
Closed
2 tasks
@MattCairns MattCairns mentioned this pull request Aug 29, 2024
Closed
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@unicornss unicornss unicornss approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@Sean-Der @codecov-io @unicornss