Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(core): update findChild, gets direct child only #3512

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2019

Conversation

mirskiy
Copy link
Contributor

@mirskiy mirskiy commented Aug 1, 2019

47bf435 changed tryFindChild to only return the direct child and updated the corresponding docs. It included a notice, "BREAKING CHANGE: construct.findChild() now only looks up direct children", but did not update the findChild docs.


Please read the contribution guidelines and follow the pull-request checklist.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@mirskiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

mirskiy commented Aug 1, 2019

There's also a typo in the tests,

test.ok(!root.node.tryFindChild('NotFound'), 'findChild(name) returns undefined if the child is not found');

The test uses tryFindChild (which returns undefined) but the title states findChild (which throws an error) returns undefined. Let me know which side should be fixed and whether it should be lumped into this PR or separate.

@rix0rrr
Copy link
Contributor

rix0rrr commented Aug 5, 2019

The test uses tryFindChild (which returns undefined) but the title states findChild

The test correctly exercises the intended behavior of tryFindChild. So the title needs to be fixed.

@rix0rrr rix0rrr merged commit ef8f0cd into aws:master Aug 5, 2019
eladb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2019
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2019
* chore: update package-lock.json

* feat(eks): define kubernetes resources

This change allows defining arbitrary Kubernetes resources within an EKS cluster.

* nice!

* update readme

* Update README.md

* feat(events): ability to add cross-account targets (#3323)

This adds the capability of adding a target to an event rule
that belongs to a different account than the rule itself.
Required for things like cross-account CodePipelines with source actions triggered by events.

* chore(ci): add mergify config file (#3502)

* chore: update jsii to 0.14.3 (#3513)

* fix(iam): correctly limit the default PolicyName to 128 characters (#3487)

Our logic for trimming the length of the default IAM policy name was not working,
as it wasn't updated when logicalId became a Token rather than a literate string,
and so it was never actually triggered
(it just checked that the display name of the Token was less than 128 characters,
which it always is).
The fix is to resolve the logical ID Token before applying the trimming logic.

Fixes #3402

* v1.3.0 (#3516)

See CHANGELOG

* fix: typo in restapi.ts (#3530)

* feat(ecs): container dependencies (#3032)

Add new addContainerDependencies method to allow for container dependencies
Fixes #2490

* feat(s3-deployment): CloudFront invalidation (#3213)

see #3106

* docs(core): findChild gets direct child only (#3512)

* doc(iam): update references to addManagedPolicy (#3511)

* fix(sqs): do not emit grants to the AWS-managed encryption key (#3169)

Grants on the `alias/aws/sqs` KMS key alias are not necessary since the
key will implicitly allow for it's intended usage to be fulfilled (as
opposed to how you have to manage grants yourself when using a
user-managed key instead).

This removes the statement that was generated using an invalid resource
entry.

Fixes #2794

* fix(lambda): allow ArnPrincipal in grantInvoke (#3501)

Fixes #3264 

I'm trying to allow a lambda function in another account to be able to invoke my CDK generated lambda function. This works through the CLI like so:

    aws lambda add-permission --function-name=myFunction --statement-id=ABoldStatement --action=lambda:InvokeFunction --principal=arn:aws:iam::{account_id}:role/a_lambda_execution_role

But CDK doesn't seem to allow me to add an ArnPrincipal doing something like this:

    myFunction.grantInvoke(new iam.ArnPrincipal(props.myARN))

With the error:

    Invalid principal type for Lambda permission statement: ArnPrincipal. Supported: AccountPrincipal, ServicePrincipal

This PR allows ArnPrincipal to be passed to lambda.grantInvoke.

There might be some additional validation required on the exact ARN as I believe only some ARNs are supported by lambda add-permission

* chore(contrib): remove API stabilization disclaimer

* fix(ssm): add GetParameters action to grantRead() (#3546)

* misc

* rename `KubernetesManifest` to `KubernetesResource` and `addResource`
* move AWS Auth APIs to `cluster.awsAuth` and expose `AwsAuth`
* remove the yaml library (we can just use a JSON stream)
* add support for adding accounts to aws-auth
* fix cluster deletion bug
* move kubctl app info to constants

* addManifest => addResource

* update test expectations

* add unit test for customresrouce.ref

* fix sample link
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants