-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(release): 2.181.1 #33612
chore(release): 2.181.1 #33612
Conversation
…rrectly (#33609) ### Issue # (if applicable) Closes #33510 ### Reason for this change A previous change ([PR33305](#33305)) removed the `IdentityPoolRoleAttachment` L2 construct, which also changed the creation logic of the default role attachment in the `IdentityPool` L2. This not only triggered redeployments, but did not allow for redeployment at all, as the new role attachment (with a different resource hash) was trying to be created before the old one was removed. This led to failed deployments, as only one role attachment can exist per identity pool. ### Description of changes Brought back the `IdentityPoolRoleAttachment` L2 logic to prevent redeployment for customers using CDK `<v2.179.0`. However, the construct is now no longer being exported, which preserves the original intention of preventing confusion about using this resource. ### Describe any new or updated permissions being added N/A ### Description of how you validated changes `yarn test && yarn integ test/integ.identitypool.js --update-on-failed` ### Checklist - [x] My code adheres to the [CONTRIBUTING GUIDE](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and [DESIGN GUIDELINES](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/docs/DESIGN_GUIDELINES.md) **BREAKING CHANGE**: Any `IdentityPool` resources deployed in versions `>=2.179.0` will now fail to deploy. You will need to delete the `IdentityPoolRoleAttachment` from your stack via the console before redeploying. ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(This review is outdated)
Exemption Request: I didn't make those changes, the automation pushed them |
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be automatically updated and merged without squashing (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see. |
See CHANGELOG