Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(assertions): added getResourceId method to Template #33521

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vdahlberg
Copy link

Reason for this change

Sometimes you want to correlate how cloudformation resources correlate to each other.
CDK synthesizes the template expectedly with Ref and Fn:GetAtt.

Currently you'll have to do something like this to verify that a bucketpolicy is attached to the correct bucket:

const resources = template.findResources('AWS::S3::Bucket', {
  Properties: {
    BucketName: 'my-bucket',
  }
})

const keys = Object.keys(resources)
if (keys.length === 0) {
    throw new Error('Resource not found.')
}
if (keys.length !== 1) {
    throw new Error('Resource is not unique.')
}
const bucket = keys[0]

template.hasResourceProperties('AWS::S3::BucketPolicy', {
  Bucket: {
    Ref: bucket,
  },
 // ....
})

Description of changes

Added method getResourceId on Template to retrieve a distinct match's resource id.

// throws AssertionError on none or multiple matches
const bucket = template.getResourceId('AWS::S3::Bucket', {
  Properties: {
    BucketName: 'my-bucket',
  }
})

template.hasResourceProperties('AWS::S3::BucketPolicy', {
  Bucket: {
    Ref: bucket,
  },
  // ....
})

Description of how you validated changes

Unit tests. Integration tests not applicable.

Checklist


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team February 20, 2025 14:29
@github-actions github-actions bot added beginning-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 0-2 PRs to the CDK p2 labels Feb 20, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(This review is outdated)

@vdahlberg vdahlberg force-pushed the feat/assertions/add-getresourceid branch from 2812d88 to 743a110 Compare February 20, 2025 14:46
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 743a110
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@vdahlberg
Copy link
Author

Exemption Request

Only changes in assertions module

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added pr-linter/exemption-requested The contributor has requested an exemption to the PR Linter feedback. pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. labels Feb 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@GavinZZ GavinZZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing, thank you!

@GavinZZ GavinZZ added the pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes label Feb 28, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation removed the pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. label Feb 28, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review February 28, 2025 23:21

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 28, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Mar 1, 2025

This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: pull request branch update failed.

The pull request can't be updated

You should look at the reason for the failure and decide if the pull request needs to be fixed or if you want to requeue it.

If you want to requeue this pull request, you need to post a comment with the text: @mergifyio requeue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beginning-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 0-2 PRs to the CDK p2 pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes pr-linter/exemption-requested The contributor has requested an exemption to the PR Linter feedback.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants