Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(amplify-alpha): support custom response headers in monorepo structures #31771

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

georeeve
Copy link

@georeeve georeeve commented Oct 15, 2024

Issue # (if applicable)

Closes #31758.

Reason for this change

The current custom response headers implementation does not support Amplify apps with monorepo structures, this is due to a difference in the YAML formats for these apps: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amplify/latest/userguide/custom-header-YAML-format.html

Description of changes

An appRoot property has been added to CustomResponseHeader, which specifies the appRoot from the build spec to use for the output YAML.

Description of how you validated changes

I added unit tests and tested the implementation using a sample deployment. I'm happy to add integration tests if required.

Checklist


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@github-actions github-actions bot added beginning-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 0-2 PRs to the CDK bug This issue is a bug. p2 labels Oct 15, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team October 15, 2024 23:07
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added pr/reviewer-clarification-requested The contributor has requested clarification on feedback, a failing build, or a failing PR Linter run and removed pr/reviewer-clarification-requested The contributor has requested clarification on feedback, a failing build, or a failing PR Linter run labels Oct 16, 2024
@georeeve georeeve marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2024 08:08
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. and removed pr/reviewer-clarification-requested The contributor has requested clarification on feedback, a failing build, or a failing PR Linter run pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. labels Oct 16, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review October 16, 2024 09:25

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. label Oct 16, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the effort/medium Medium work item – several days of effort label Oct 17, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR has been in the BUILD FAILING state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. To keep this PR from being closed, please continue work on it. If not, it will automatically be closed in a week.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR has been deemed to be abandoned, and will be automatically closed. Please create a new PR for these changes if you think this decision has been made in error.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the closed-for-staleness This issue was automatically closed because it hadn't received any attention in a while. label Feb 6, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2025
@aaythapa aaythapa reopened this Feb 10, 2025
@aaythapa aaythapa added the pr-linter/do-not-close The PR linter will not close this PR while this label is present label Feb 10, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: bf45d53
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
beginning-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 0-2 PRs to the CDK bug This issue is a bug. closed-for-staleness This issue was automatically closed because it hadn't received any attention in a while. effort/medium Medium work item – several days of effort p2 pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. pr-linter/do-not-close The PR linter will not close this PR while this label is present
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

(amplify-alpha): customResponseHeaders does not support monorepo structures
3 participants