fix(parser): make identitySource optional for ApiGatewayAuthorizerRequestV2 model #5880
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #5880 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 96.17% 96.17%
========================================
Files 232 232
Lines 10941 10941
Branches 2023 2023
========================================
Hits 10522 10522
Misses 329 329
Partials 90 90 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue number: #5879
Summary
This PR allows IdentitySource in ApiGatewayAuthorizerRequestV2 as Optional.
Changes
When a Lambda authorizer lacks a defined identity source, the identitySource field within ApiGatewayAuthorizerRequestV2 can be empty.
User experience
Checklist
If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.
Is this a breaking change?
RFC issue number:
Checklist:
Acknowledgment
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.
Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.