feat(autoware_tracking_object_merger)!: tier4_debug_msgs changed to autoware_internal_debug_msgs in autoware_tracking_object_merger

[vish0012]

…es perception/autoware_tracking_object_merger

Description

The tier4_debug_msgs have been replaced with autoware_internal_debug_msgs to enhance clarity and consistency in the codebase.

autowarefoundation/autoware#5580

Related links

Parent Issue:

autowarefoundation/autoware#5580

How was this PR tested?

Test are done in the following TIER IV internal evaluator:

https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/bfc0e074-207b-5ece-83e5-fb769f6f7272?project_id=prd_jt
https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/4df9332b-024e-5907-ada9-fbbcb8c20b3d?project_id=prd_jt
https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/ce1a0892-d8aa-5729-b25d-6d2d57bea034?project_id=prd_jt

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

Topic Type	Topic Name	Old Message Type	New Message Type
Pub	debug/cyclic_time_ms	tier4_debug_msgs/Float64Stamped	autoware_internal_debug_msgs/Float64Stamped
Pub	debug/processing_time_ms	tier4_debug_msgs/Float64Stamped	autoware_internal_debug_msgs/Float64Stamped

Effects on system behavior

None.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[YoshiRi]

Thanks! could you link the parent issue to this PR description?

[vish0012]

Thanks! could you link the parent issue to this PR description?

thank you for your comment , i have updated the link in PR description.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 29.21%. Comparing base (96708f9) to head (e4ec15c).
Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ject_merger/src/decorative_tracker_merger_node.cpp	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9899      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   29.46%   29.21%   -0.26%     
==========================================
  Files        1417     1410       -7     
  Lines      107419   107148     -271     
  Branches    42562    42454     -108     
==========================================
- Hits        31651    31300     -351     
+ Misses      72687    72629      -58     
- Partials     3081     3219     +138     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	0.00% <0.00%> (?)
differential-cuda	0.00% <0.00%> (?)
total	29.21% <ø> (-0.25%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from b7b3dd6

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Shin-kyoto]

@vish0012
Please fill "How was this PR tested?". You need to check this PR by running autoware.
Please fill "Interface changes"

[mitsudome-r]

Test are done in the following TIER IV internal evaluator:

• https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/bfc0e074-207b-5ece-83e5-fb769f6f7272?project_id=prd_jt
• https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/4df9332b-024e-5907-ada9-fbbcb8c20b3d?project_id=prd_jt
• https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/ce1a0892-d8aa-5729-b25d-6d2d57bea034?project_id=prd_jt

[Shin-kyoto]

LGTM

• I confirm that the content is good to merge and the test result shows this PR is properly tested to ensure it will not introduce any bugs.
• I did NOT check this PR by running autoware.