feat(avoidance): add use_conservative_buffer_longitudinal

[takayuki5168]

Description

Added a parameter of use_conservative_buffer_longitudinal.

• When set to true,
  • the base_link2front is added to the longitudinal buffer before avoidance to be comparatively conservative against the distance to the object.
• When set to false,
  • the base_link2front is NOT added to the longitudinal buffer before avoidance to be comparatively aggressive against the distance to the object.

Tests performed

psim
unit test

Effects on system behavior

No behavior change by default

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 133 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (f400b91) 14.80% compared to head (438d5ec) 14.80%.
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5405   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   14.80%   14.80%           
=======================================
  Files        1661     1661           
  Lines      115453   115482   +29     
  Branches    35644    35650    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits        17093    17098    +5     
- Misses      79114    79132   +18     
- Partials    19246    19252    +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	12.34% <7.63%> (?)
total	14.81% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from f400b91

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...motion_utils/src/vehicle/vehicle_state_checker.cpp	72.54% <ø> (-1.04%)	⬇️
...et2_map_loader/lanelet2_map_visualization_node.cpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
..._planner/utils/avoidance/avoidance_module_data.hpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ehavior_velocity_intersection_module/src/debug.cpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...avior_velocity_intersection_module/src/manager.cpp	14.33% <ø> (ø)
...ity_intersection_module/src/scene_intersection.cpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ity_intersection_module/src/scene_intersection.hpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...behavior_velocity_intersection_module/src/util.cpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ior_velocity_intersection_module/src/util_type.hpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...cene_module/start_planner/start_planner_module.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 8 more

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.