refactor(traffic_light_classifier): update training docs

[kaancolak]

Description

Training of the traffic light classifier model isn't up-to-date. Model training and ONNX conversion scripts changed up-to-date repos of mmlab.

I have updated the custom training and detailed more.

autowarefoundation/autoware-documentation#447

Tests performed

Not applicable.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[kaancolak]

@yukke42 @miursh @yukkysaito Could you look into this PR?

[yukkysaito]

Thank you for your PR 👍
Autoware Documentation might be better written where it is implementation-independent.
@mitsudome-r
In that case, would it be better to skip the link from Autoware Documentation to README.md?

[kaancolak]

Thank you for your PR 👍 Autoware Documentation might be better written where it is implementation-independent. @mitsudome-r In that case, would it be better to skip the link from Autoware Documentation to README.md?

@yukkysaito Saito-san thanks for your feedback. Mitsudome-san also agrees with you, I will refactor PR after it is done.

[yukkysaito]

@mitsudome-r How about you?

[kaancolak]

@mitsudome-r How about you?

@yukkysaito Saito-san, he also has the same idea as you. I updated the PR.

After @xmfcx upload traffic_light_sample_dataset to AWS, I will open PR to review.

[kaancolak]

@yukkysaito @miursh @yukke42 Could you review this PR or assign an appropriate reviewer? FYI: @mitsudome-r

[yukkysaito]

LGTM

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.51% 🎉

Comparison is base (4dd6960) 15.14% compared to head (76b52e8) 15.65%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4917      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   15.14%   15.65%   +0.51%     
==========================================
  Files        1581     1584       +3     
  Lines      110014   108904    -1110     
  Branches    34487    33280    -1207     
==========================================
+ Hits        16660    17054     +394     
+ Misses      74710    73353    -1357     
+ Partials    18644    18497     -147     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	0.00% <ø> (?)
total	15.65% <ø> (+0.51%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from 3e03a0d

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
localization/ekf_localizer/src/ekf_localizer.cpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...on_planner/src/mission_planner/mission_planner.cpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 149 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.