fix(static_centerline_optimizer): add mission_planner's param for launch

[takayuki5168]

Description

static_centerline_optimizer cannot be launched from autoware_launch due to the following change.
#3127

I added mission_planner's param when launching static_centerline_optimizer from launch.

FYI: The test to launch static_centerline_optimizer (not from autoware_launch) passed since mission_planner's parameter is given in this case.

autoware.universe/planning/static_centerline_optimizer/test/test_static_centerline_optimizer.test.py

Lines 46 to 50 in 59650ed

	os.path.join(
	get_package_share_directory("mission_planner"),
	"config",
	"mission_planner.param.yaml",
	),

Tests performed

launch test passed.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[takayuki5168]

@kosuke55 Could you approve the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (61d886f) 12.32% compared to head (7d87c7f) 12.32%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3360   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   12.32%   12.32%           
=======================================
  Files        1380     1380           
  Lines       96704    96704           
  Branches    27971    27971           
=======================================
  Hits        11918    11918           
  Misses      72156    72156           
  Partials    12630    12630           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	29.47% <ø> (?)
total	12.32% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 61d886f

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[shmpwk]

LGTM！