feat(autoware_vehicle_info_utils): porting from universe to core

[JianKangEgon]

Description

We are porting autoware_vehicle_info_utils to autoware.core, and this PR adds the package to core.

• Issue Link Port 'autoware_vehicle_info_utils' and 'autoware_universe_utils' from Autoware Universe to Autoware Core #131

Related links

Parent Issue:

• Link

How was this PR tested?

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[JianKangEgon]

This pr depends on the new ported package "autoware_utils": autowarefoundation/autoware_utils#23

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 55.44554% with 45 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.74%. Comparing base (4cb18f5) to head (27ab7a0).
Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...n/autoware_vehicle_info_utils/src/vehicle_info.cpp	54.34%	18 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...ehicle_info_utils/test/test_vehicle_info_utils.cpp	40.62%	0 Missing and 19 partials ⚠️
...ware_vehicle_info_utils/src/vehicle_info_utils.cpp	77.27%	4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #170      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.75%   70.74%   -8.01%     
==========================================
  Files          11       15       +4     
  Lines         193      294     +101     
  Branches       73      129      +56     
==========================================
+ Hits          152      208      +56     
- Misses         11       33      +22     
- Partials       30       53      +23     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	55.44% <55.44%> (?)
total	78.75% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from b0f4034

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[youtalk]

LGTM

[kosuke55]

@mitsudome-r -san will check and merge this PR (internal slack )

[mitsudome-r]

@JianKangEgon
The build doesn't pass with Autoware.Universe due to change in include directory structure. bbaf767

I know you did this to match with our coding guideline, but we would have to modify all the packages that depend on autoware_vehicle_info_utils in Autoware.Universe to fix this.

For now, maybe we could make add an include file in old file path(include/autoware_vehicle_info_utils/vehicle_info_utils.hpp) with the following content for compatibility

// this file is for backward compatibility
// TODO: remove this file after the transition to the new vehicle info utils

#ifndef AUTOWARE_VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS__VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS_HPP_
#define AUTOWARE_VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS__VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS_HPP_

#include <autoware/vehicle_info_utils/vehicle_info_utils.hpp>

#endif  // AUTOWARE_VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS__VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS_HPP_

[liuXinGangChina]

@JianKangEgon The build doesn't pass with Autoware.Universe due to change in include directory structure. bbaf767

I know you did this to match with our coding guideline, but we would have to modify all the packages that depend on autoware_vehicle_info_utils in Autoware.Universe to fix this.

For now, maybe we could make add an include file in old file path(include/autoware_vehicle_info_utils/vehicle_info_utils.hpp) with the following content for compatibility

// this file is for backward compatibility
// TODO: remove this file after the transition to the new vehicle info utils

#ifndef AUTOWARE_VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS__VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS_HPP_
#define AUTOWARE_VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS__VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS_HPP_

#include <autoware/vehicle_info_utils/vehicle_info_utils.hpp>

#endif  // AUTOWARE_VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS__VEHICLE_INFO_UTILS_HPP_

got it mits san @mitsudome-r

we will revise this pr according to your comment