Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parameter defines it's own reference property #165

Closed
jonaslagoni opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 7 comments · Fixed by #275
Closed

Parameter defines it's own reference property #165

jonaslagoni opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 7 comments · Fixed by #275
Labels
bug Something isn't working good first issue Good for newcomers Hacktoberfest Label issues as available for participants of https://hacktoberfest.digitalocean.com released

Comments

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

jonaslagoni commented Feb 3, 2022

Describe the bug

Similar to #164 we have a problem with parameter defining it's own reference property:

Expected behavior

Parameters should use:

  "additionalProperties": {
    "oneOf": [{"$ref": "#/definitions/parameter"}, {"$ref": "#/definitions/Reference"}]
  },
@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 3, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 4, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jun 4, 2022
@derberg derberg added good first issue Good for newcomers and removed stale labels Jun 7, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 6, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Oct 6, 2022
@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member Author

Yep 👍

@derberg derberg added Hacktoberfest Label issues as available for participants of https://hacktoberfest.digitalocean.com and removed stale labels Oct 11, 2022
@mastdev
Copy link
Contributor

mastdev commented Oct 18, 2022

Hi, I get the message on hacktoberfest.com that the repository is not participating in Hacktoberfest 2022. @derberg Can you please confirm? Thanks

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Oct 19, 2022

@mastdev we definitely are. It was maybe because hacktoberfest topic on the repo was missing. But as you can see, proper label is there. You can pick it up. It is a nice learning if you did not know JSON Schema before.

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 4.0.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working good first issue Good for newcomers Hacktoberfest Label issues as available for participants of https://hacktoberfest.digitalocean.com released
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants