[ruff] Skip type definitions for missing-f-string-syntax (RUF027)
#16054
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AlexWaygood
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Excellent, thank you! We could consider adding an integration test in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/main/crates/ruff/tests/lint.rs that runs TC006 in combination with RUF027 on this snippet. But it's probably not really necessary here
Yeah, I think it's probably okay. FWIW I tested it manually. |
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As an f-string is never correct in a type definition context, we skip missing-f-string-syntax (RUF027) in this case.
Closes #16037