Add option arguments for FortUTF_Find_Tests #23
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@yanjen Could I ask you to also update the docs on how to use this, thanks! |
artemis-beta
requested changes
Jun 13, 2024
Yes, of course, I will add them in the usage.md |
|
@artemis-beta Hi I think this PR is ready for review. |
artemis-beta
approved these changes
Jul 2, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It would be very useful if we can add external libraries or independent flags for the test functions.
Some direct use examples includes if we want to use functions from the LAPACK library (library), or if we want to test our code with OpenACC (flag + library).
For an example, I make a library from
demo_functions.f90and show how it can be passed in the demo example.