Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Arrow Core & Fx syntax for Kotlin's Result type #2478
Add Arrow Core & Fx syntax for Kotlin's Result type #2478
Changes from 2 commits
cf69940
4c1faf8
9d88c5f
6040687
ec2d9ee
8bc2cd7
d0bab2e
65bc367
5a49dff
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had a random thought, not blocking of course. I was wondering if it would make it easier to read these zip implementations if we use computations instead of delegate to higher arity functions,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I choose the most effiecient implementation that was still somewhat readablee and short here. Writing this as a
nullable { }
will suffer from the same problem. The only way to write this properly is to be fully exhaustive withfold
but that exploses quickly.