-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 507
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
vector mode settings #1620
Comments
Totally agree. This is something I have been thinking about for a long time too, I just have to find a way to prevent someone from setting "no fill" and then setting "no border" and then complaining that nothing comes out of them. |
PS. when it's not a bug, but a feature suggest, please use "discussion" section. |
understand your concern, of users experiencing no outcome from their selectionst, and not realizing what they have done. a couple of ideas The message could be placed above or below the check box I hope this gives an idea on how to resolve the concern Sorry about placing the comment in the wrong area. I was led astray. Will do next time. In the mean time i look forward to your implementation of this feature. |
Thinking this through further
Suggest placing Smin Smax for fill and border side by side with a title for
each column in laser Options
LASER OPTIONS
Laser Mode .......................................
Fill "fill mode" Border enabled [ ]
S-MIN [___] 100% S-MIN [___] 100%
S-MAX [___] 100% S-MAX [___] 100%
Warning text line located here to explain the users choice of no output, or
to explain why they cannot uncheck "border enabled"
return to WCS X0 Y0 [checked] on job completion
"fill mode" can be "enabled" or "none" or a repeat of selected option or
empty if a mode selected.
if no fill selected the column could be shaded out disabling any input
with settings of 0
likewise if border enabled unchecked this column could be shaded with
settings of 0
…On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 3:07 PM arkypita ***@***.***> wrote:
PS. when it's not a bug, but a feature suggest, please use "discussion"
section.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1620 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWDE6TMMAE3SMGVRLJFRER3UHMNGXANCNFSM5GFCPEJA>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
final thought and i believe the best option, requires display of one of two
dialog boxes for laser settings
When clicking on next on import raster image box - check fill selection -
if none open "target image border" dialog
this box only has border fields with no ability to disable the border
if fill selection not "none" open "target image" dialog
this box has fields for both fill and border, with an option to skip the
border process, and a check box to indicate that it is a cut
(cut option would ensure inside cuts are made before the perimeter)
this solves the issue of no output, and eliminates any confusion on
parameters used
i still like the program to position at wcs x0 y0 so that another file
can be loaded to cutout the material ensuring it starts at the correct
location
i have been generating files with an image line by line, followed by a
vector file, followed by a cut file.
thanks for considering this. I hope this input helps you
…On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:08 PM Wray Hutton ***@***.***> wrote:
Thinking this through further
Suggest placing Smin Smax for fill and border side by side with a title
for each column in laser Options
LASER OPTIONS
Laser Mode .......................................
Fill "fill mode" Border enabled [ ]
S-MIN [___] 100% S-MIN [___] 100%
S-MAX [___] 100% S-MAX [___] 100%
Warning text line located here to explain the users choice of no output,
or to explain why they cannot uncheck "border enabled"
return to WCS X0 Y0 [checked] on job completion
"fill mode" can be "enabled" or "none" or a repeat of selected option or
empty if a mode selected.
if no fill selected the column could be shaded out disabling any input
with settings of 0
likewise if border enabled unchecked this column could be shaded with
settings of 0
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 3:07 PM arkypita ***@***.***> wrote:
> PS. when it's not a bug, but a feature suggest, please use "discussion"
> section.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#1620 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWDE6TMMAE3SMGVRLJFRER3UHMNGXANCNFSM5GFCPEJA>
> .
> Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
> <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
> or Android
> <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
>
>
|
This would be a really useful feature. I've also found the the border can destroy fine details. Any thoughts on implementing this? |
on some vector images that i burn the image is destroyed when it does the the outline border.
in the vector generation dialog
You have parameters for border speed and filling speed, but only one laser strength setting Smin and Smax.
This becomes an issue with text in logos, when the logo or text is very small. It is also a problem with a complex image that has very fine (thin) edges.
Second minor issue consider adding a check box, or set the default to return to x0 y0 on job completion
please consider
This is an excellent product, and works very well, Thank you for all of your work.
what i currently do is set different speeds, Save the .nc file, open in an editor and locate the border/outline
block and either delete the block, or global search and replace to set a new Smax and if necessary adjust the speed
on some occasions i have removed sections of the outline where it has a tendency to over burn edges.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: