-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Invariant Violation: Invariant Violation: 44 #19
Comments
I'm currently trying to track down an Invariant Violation: 8 and having the same experience manually searching the code. The text in parenthesis says to visit this repository, but there is not a clear next step once you get here. |
For me it happened when I have |
When an invariant fails in production, a cryptic numeric error of the form `Invariant Violation: 42` is thrown, with a reference to the error codes section of invariant-packages README.md: https://github.com/apollographql/invariant-packages#error-codes This vague guidance has not proven adequate in many cases, to say the least: see apollographql/invariant-packages#18, apollographql/invariant-packages#19, #6604, Using error codes instead of error strings remains important for production bundle sizes, but I think we can make it substantially easier to look up the error string corresponding to each error code, by generating a single file containing all the invariant error codes for each @apollo/client release. Starting with Apollo Client 3.1.0, this manifest file can be found in @apollo/client/invariantErrorCodes.js (using an npm/yarn-installed copy of @apollo/client, since this file is generated in the ./dist directory, not checked into the repository). The file contains an explanatory comment, the @apollo/client version, and a sequential map from error numbers to the { file, node } responsible for the error. I wish we could go back and republish old versions of @apollo/client to include this file, but at least things should be easier going forward.
When an invariant fails in production, a cryptic numeric error of the form `Invariant Violation: 42` is thrown, with a reference to the error codes section of invariant-packages README.md: https://github.com/apollographql/invariant-packages#error-codes This vague guidance has not proven adequate in many cases, to say the least: see apollographql/invariant-packages#18, apollographql/invariant-packages#19, #6604, However, this vague guidance (which was intended to suggest searching your installed node_modules/@apollo/client package for the error code) has not proven adequate in many cases, to say the least: see apollographql/invariant-packages#18, apollographql/invariant-packages#19, #6604, #5730, #5291, and #5975, to cite just a few of the many issues we've seen since #4521. Using error codes instead of error strings remains important for production bundle sizes, but I think we can make it substantially easier to look up the error string corresponding to each error code, by generating a single file containing all the invariant error codes for each @apollo/client release. Starting with Apollo Client 3.1.0, this manifest file can be found in @apollo/client/invariantErrorCodes.js (using an npm/yarn-installed copy of @apollo/client, since this file is generated in the ./dist directory, not checked into the repository). The file contains an explanatory comment, the @apollo/client version, and a sequential map from error numbers to the { file, node } responsible for the error.
…llographql#6665) When an invariant fails in production, a cryptic numeric error of the form `Invariant Violation: 42` is thrown, with a reference to the error codes section of invariant-packages README.md: https://github.com/apollographql/invariant-packages#error-codes This vague guidance has not proven adequate in many cases, to say the least: see apollographql/invariant-packages#18, apollographql/invariant-packages#19, apollographql#6604, However, this vague guidance (which was intended to suggest searching your installed node_modules/@apollo/client package for the error code) has not proven adequate in many cases, to say the least: see apollographql/invariant-packages#18, apollographql/invariant-packages#19, apollographql#6604, apollographql#5730, apollographql#5291, and apollographql#5975, to cite just a few of the many issues we've seen since apollographql#4521. Using error codes instead of error strings remains important for production bundle sizes, but I think we can make it substantially easier to look up the error string corresponding to each error code, by generating a single file containing all the invariant error codes for each @apollo/client release. Starting with Apollo Client 3.1.0, this manifest file can be found in @apollo/client/invariantErrorCodes.js (using an npm/yarn-installed copy of @apollo/client, since this file is generated in the ./dist directory, not checked into the repository). The file contains an explanatory comment, the @apollo/client version, and a sequential map from error numbers to the { file, node } responsible for the error.
@cwshevlin did you manage to resolve your issue? I'm facing the same thing now ( |
apollographql/apollo-client#6665 This should be of help to newcomers. |
So, maybe apollo should just print the messages themselves into the error, instead of having developers go through jungles of forums to find what it means? |
Sent to here with the following:
Invariant Violation: Invariant Violation: 44 (see https://github.com/apollographql/invariant-packages)
I have not a single clue what I am supposed to do. I have seen folks using
grep
like:or
None of those have a 44.
What does that mean? How should I debug this?
using:
not sure what else is relevant, cause I don't know the error's origin.
Could someone help with this?
UPDATE: I resolved the issue in my code. The problem was that I used
useQuery
/useMutation
hooks of@apollo/client
outside ofApolloProvider
.This does resolves this issue itself, the dev experience was somewhat cumbersome, and my solution was to hunt down the breaking commit, rather than getting a clear message of the possible error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: