fix(gateway): Correctly handle unions with nested conditions that have no possibleTypes
#4071
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The nested
for
loops withinsplitFields
that utilizegroupByResponseName
andgroupByParentType
make a false assumption that the incoming fields are all valid. In this case, an "invalid" field is one with nopossibleTypes
.In its current state, the
splitFields
function can consume an invalid field, leaving other valid, similarly-grouped fields ignored (only one will be taken). If an invalid field is consumed, the others will be ignored and the invalid field will subsequently be dropped, meaning the valid field is never represented due to the existence of an invalid field.Solution
A field with no
possibleTypes
can be dropped / ignored from the query since the requested field exists within an impossible condition. Thus, we can skip thecollectFields
step altogether for fields which have nopossibleTypes
. The effect of skipping this step is that invalid fields are no longer represented within thesplitFields
function, thereby resolving the issue.Fixes #3983