-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(dependencies): bumping jinja2 #26794
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #26794 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 67.22% 67.22% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 1895 1895
Lines 74211 74211
Branches 8245 8245
==========================================
- Hits 49892 49891 -1
- Misses 22247 22248 +1
Partials 2072 2072
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I approved earlier but changed my mind after seeing now that you skip the what appears to be dysfunctional pip-compile-multi
step (super slow, maybe never-ending?), wondering if that could lead to a future regression when re-generating. As far as I'm guessing, pip-compile does not look into the .txt file for input. I'd make sure to add the right rule in the corresponding .in
file to prevent regression. Also that tool does do some hash checking and may fail for the next person...
@rusackas @mistercrunch I ran
So the jinja2 bump is ok, but the lock files do need a |
This is exactly what I was trying to figure out how to do... you're a saint :) Follow-up question: with frontend stuff, there are GitHub actions that run |
@mistercrunch @villebro am I doing this right? Ran pip-compile-multi --no-upgrade, and committed everything except where it replaced |
I wonder if we should run |
Yep... we should probably have one that does this for all the "this shouldn't change" jobs — translations, npm, pip, maps, etc, all alongside the pre-commit check. |
LGTM apart from the conflicts. Am I the only for which this takes forever? Any |
SUMMARY
Just another opportunistic bump. Fixes include:
Fix compiler error when checking if required blocks in parent templates are empty. #1858
xmlattr filter does not allow keys with spaces. GHSA-h5c8-rqwp-cp95
Make error messages stemming from invalid nesting of {% trans %} blocks more helpful. #1918
BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF
TESTING INSTRUCTIONS
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION