Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-10621][SQL] Consistent naming for functions in SQL, Python, Scala #9948

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Nov 24, 2015

No description provided.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Nov 24, 2015

cc @davies / @yhuai

@yhuai
Copy link
Contributor

yhuai commented Nov 24, 2015

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 24, 2015

Test build #46629 has finished for PR 9948 at commit 1cca462.

  • This patch fails Python style tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):\n * case class GetStructField(child: Expression, ordinal: Int, name: Option[String] = None)\n * case class PrettyAttribute(name: String, dataType: DataType = NullType)\n

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 25, 2015

Test build #2107 has started for PR 9948 at commit 9aef4ec.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 25, 2015

Test build #46632 has finished for PR 9948 at commit 9aef4ec.

  • This patch fails from timeout after a configured wait of 250m.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 25, 2015

Test build #46660 has finished for PR 9948 at commit cc90254.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2015
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes #9948 from rxin/SPARK-10621.

(cherry picked from commit 151d7c2)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 151d7c2 Nov 25, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants