Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-32804][Launcher][FOLLOWUP] Fix SparkSubmitCommandBuilderSuite test failure without jars #29769

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

KevinSmile
Copy link
Contributor

@KevinSmile KevinSmile commented Sep 16, 2020

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It's a followup of #29653.
Tests in SparkSubmitCommandBuilderSuite may fail if you didn't build first and have jars before test,
so if isTesting we should set a dummy SparkLauncher.NO_RESOURCE.

Why are the changes needed?

Fix tests failure.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

mvn clean test (test without jars built first).

@KevinSmile
Copy link
Contributor Author

KevinSmile commented Sep 16, 2020

cc @HyukjinKwon

@KevinSmile KevinSmile changed the title [SPARK-32804][Launcher][FOLLOWUP] fix command builder test failure without jars [SPARK-32804][Launcher][FOLLOWUP] Fix SparkSubmitCommandBuilderSuite test failure without jars Sep 16, 2020
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

ok to test

@KevinSmile
Copy link
Contributor Author

Seems that DecommissionWorkerSuite is unstable?

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 16, 2020

Test build #128742 has finished for PR 29769 at commit e2b0c6b.

  • This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 16, 2020

Test build #128762 has finished for PR 29769 at commit e2b0c6b.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Merged to master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants