-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-29145][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Move tests from SubquerySuite
to subquery/in-subquery/in-joins.sql
#26406
Conversation
@gatorsmile @maropu |
LogicalPlan
Exist can't be change to other form of the join, and
|
How about moving these tests into
|
sorry, but I miss your point. You meant that this test could run correctly on |
No, current catalyst can't support well for In the end of above comment, you can see that some part of Physical Plan is not a Physical Plan , There is a |
Ur.... I see. You found the bug caused by your previous pr, right? If so, could you file a new jira for that and investigate the root cause of the bug there? |
I don't think it is caused by my pr. My pr focus on IN/NOT IN, behavior between
|
My pr make this situation pass Optimizer level. == , Anyway, I will raise a issue and explain the change and root cause. |
If so, could you separate the two work: the porting task you requested and the bug fix? I'm pretty confused now. |
Yeah, I want to make it clear to you since in comment #25854 (comment) @gatorsmile mentioned two problem together. I will raise a issue for |
move to in-join.sql, it will be run in three configuration auto? |
Yea, you need to nothing for that. btw, still |
Remove |
Can you remove the test of |
SubquerySuite
to subquery/in-subquery/in-joins.sql
Done |
create temporary view s3 as select * from values | ||
(3), (4), (6), (9) | ||
as s3(id); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Plz drop view in the end?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Plz drop view in the end?
About t1, t2, t3, seems in other test file, don't drop table.
ok to test |
Test build #113536 has finished for PR 26406 at commit
|
Test build #113538 has finished for PR 26406 at commit
|
@maropu Passed test, any more work to do? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for pinging me, @maropu . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, LGTM. Merged to master.
Thanks, @dongjoon-hyun ! |
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow comment of #25854 (comment)
Why are the changes needed?
NO
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
NO
How was this patch tested?
ADD TEST CASE