-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-25454][SQL] Avoid precision loss in division with decimal with negative scale #22450
Closed
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7c4b454
[SPARK-25454][SQL] Avoid precision loss in division with decimal with…
mgaido91 520b64e
address comment
mgaido91 27a9ea6
address comments
mgaido91 4e240d9
add tests
mgaido91 dd19f7f
add comments
mgaido91 b01cbc3
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into SPARK-25454
mgaido91 97b9c56
fix test failures
mgaido91 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This rule was added long time ago, do you mean this is a long-standing bug?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I think this is more clear in the related JIRA description and comments. The problem is that here we have never handled properly decimals with negative scale. The point is: before 2.3, this could happen only if someone was creating some specific literal from a BigDecimal, like
lit(BigDecimal(100e6))
; since 2.3, this can happen with every constant like 100e6 in the SQL code. So the problem has been there for a while, but we haven't seen it because it was less likely to happen.Another solution would be avoiding having decimals with a negative scale. But this is quite a breaking change, so I'd avoid until a 3.0 release at least.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah i see. Can we add a test in
DataFrameSuite
with decimal literal?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we update the document of this rule to reflect this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure, but if you agree I'll try and find a better place than
DataFrameSuite
. I'd prefer adding the new tests toArithmeticExpressionSuite
. Is that ok for you?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SGTM