Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[MINOR] Fix typos in ML scaladocs #20300

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[MINOR] Fix typos in ML scaladocs #20300

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

BryanCutler
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fixed some typos found in ML scaladocs

How was this patch tested?

NA

@BryanCutler
Copy link
Member Author

ping @holdenk @MLnick

srowen
srowen approved these changes Jan 17, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@srowen srowen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Normally I'd say, please look for more typos while you're at it. But I spell-checked the module again and didn't see any obvious ones. Looks fine.

@BryanCutler
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @srowen, I honestly tried to look for more and was surprised this was all I could find!

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 17, 2018

Test build #86294 has finished for PR 20300 at commit 6a642e5.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Jan 17, 2018

Merged to master

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 7823d43 Jan 17, 2018
@BryanCutler BryanCutler deleted the ml-doc-typos-MINOR branch March 6, 2018 23:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@srowen srowen srowen approved these changes

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@BryanCutler @SparkQA @srowen @HyukjinKwon