Fix example of tf_idf with minDocFreq

[maximerihouey]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The python example for tf_idf with the parameter "minDocFreq" is not properly set up because the same variable is used to transform the document for both with and without the "minDocFreq" parameter.
The IDF(minDocFreq=2) is stored in the variable "idfIgnore" but then it is the original variable "idf" used to transform the "tf" instead of the "idfIgnore".

How was this patch tested?

Before the results for "tfidf" and "tfidfIgnore" were the same:
tfidf:
(1048576,[1046921],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046920],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046923],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892732],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892733],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892734],[3.75828890549])
tfidfIgnore:
(1048576,[1046921],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046920],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046923],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892732],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892733],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892734],[3.75828890549])

After the fix those are how they should be:
tfidf:
(1048576,[1046921],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046920],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046923],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892732],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892733],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892734],[3.75828890549])
tfidfIgnore:
(1048576,[1046921],[0.0])
(1048576,[1046920],[0.0])
(1048576,[1046923],[0.0])
(1048576,[892732],[0.0])
(1048576,[892733],[0.0])
(1048576,[892734],[0.0])

[maximerihouey]

Yes

[srowen]

@maximerihouey that's just the bot asking us to confirm it can test. Yes, seems OK as a trivial fix.

[srowen]

Jenkins test this please

[SparkQA]

Test build #67034 has finished for PR 15503 at commit d8f3ce5.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[holdenk]

this looks like a reasonable improvement (unfortunate that the examples don't have any with numDoc >2 but such is life).

[maximerihouey]

Indeed. The "kmeans_data.txt" file is not ideal for showcasing this feature.

[srowen]

Merged to master/2.0