Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pipe: Removed mayLinkedTsFileCountReachDangerousThreshold judgement from stuck restart logic #12041

Merged

Conversation

Caideyipi
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

As the title said. This logic may cause forever restarting when tsFile num is very large or the sending itself is slow.


This PR has:

  • been self-reviewed.
    • concurrent read
    • concurrent write
    • concurrent read and write
  • added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
  • added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods.
  • added or updated version, license, or notice information
  • added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious
    for an unfamiliar reader.
  • added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, ensuring the threshold
    for code coverage.
  • added integration tests.
  • been tested in a test IoTDB cluster.

Key changed/added classes (or packages if there are too many classes) in this PR

@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu self-requested a review February 18, 2024 03:18
@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu self-assigned this Feb 18, 2024
@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu merged commit 89b9804 into apache:master Feb 18, 2024
37 checks passed
HTHou pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2024
…rom stuck restart logic (#12041)

This logic may cause forever restarting when tsFile num is very large or the sending itself is slow.
SzyWilliam pushed a commit to SzyWilliam/iotdb that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
…rom stuck restart logic (apache#12041)

This logic may cause forever restarting when tsFile num is very large or the sending itself is slow.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants