Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce the asList method in ConfigOptions #9

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 3, 2022
Merged

Conversation

zuston
Copy link
Member

@zuston zuston commented Jul 2, 2022

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Introduce the asList method in ConfigOptions

Why are the changes needed?

It’s necessary when getting the list of values from the config directly.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

UT

@zuston
Copy link
Member Author

zuston commented Jul 2, 2022

@jerqi Could u help review?

@jerqi
Copy link
Contributor

jerqi commented Jul 2, 2022

Our RssConf imitate SparkConf's style. SparkConf don't have this function, too. Is it better to split config options on the outside of RssConf?

@zuston
Copy link
Member Author

zuston commented Jul 2, 2022

I think it looks RssConf imitate FlinkConf's style. In Flink, it has asList method.

@jerqi
Copy link
Contributor

jerqi commented Jul 2, 2022

I think it looks RssConf imitate FlinkConf's style. In Flink, it has asList method.

OK.

@zuston
Copy link
Member Author

zuston commented Jul 3, 2022

Updated. @jerqi

@zuston zuston requested a review from jerqi July 3, 2022 02:47
@zuston zuston requested a review from jerqi July 3, 2022 05:57
Copy link
Contributor

@jerqi jerqi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your contribution.

@jerqi jerqi merged commit 317780b into apache:master Jul 3, 2022
jerqi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make the conf of rss.storage.basePath as list

### Why are the changes needed?
Follow up the PR #9 

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
No need
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants