Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-21302][table-planner-blink] Fix NPE when use row_number() in over agg #14880

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

beyond1920
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

Fix NPE when use row_number() in over agg.

Brief change log

Minor update in DeclarativeAggCodeGen to take aggregate without parameters into consideration.

Verifying this change

ITCase

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): no
  • The serializers: no
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: no
  • The S3 file system connector: no

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Feb 5, 2021

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 72a1f4b (Fri May 28 09:13:36 UTC 2021)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Feb 5, 2021

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run travis re-run the last Travis build
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Copy link
Contributor

@godfreyhe godfreyhe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution @beyond1920 , It's better we make sure that the argIndexes is not null when AggregateInfo is created. That we can safely use the argIndexes anywhere.

@beyond1920
Copy link
Contributor Author

@godfreyhe Thanks for the review. I've addressed.

@beyond1920
Copy link
Contributor Author

@flinkbot run azure

@beyond1920 beyond1920 force-pushed the rowNumber branch 2 times, most recently from 55ad256 to ebe907b Compare April 20, 2021 03:00
Copy link
Contributor

@godfreyhe godfreyhe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we need only make sure the argIndexes is not null when calling transformToAggregateInfo method. if that, there is only one place that needs to be changed.

@beyond1920
Copy link
Contributor Author

@flinkbot run azure

@beyond1920 beyond1920 closed this Apr 21, 2021
@beyond1920 beyond1920 reopened this Apr 21, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@godfreyhe godfreyhe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@godfreyhe godfreyhe closed this in 293739d Apr 21, 2021
godfreyhe pushed a commit to godfreyhe/flink that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2021
xinggit pushed a commit to xinggit/flink that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2021
"5,3",
"5,4",
"5,5")
assertEquals(expected, sink.getAppendResults)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No sort here, this case is unstable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants