Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[bugfix](memoryleak) close expr after it is pushdown to storage layer #18849

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 20, 2023

Conversation

yiguolei
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

InState is not release after in predicate is pushdown to storage layer, so that it will cause memory leak.

Problem summary

Describe your changes.

Checklist(Required)

  • Does it affect the original behavior
  • Has unit tests been added
  • Has document been added or modified
  • Does it need to update dependencies
  • Is this PR support rollback (If NO, please explain WHY)

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@yiguolei yiguolei added dev/1.2.5-merged usercase Important user case type label labels Apr 20, 2023
@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 907715c into apache:branch-1.2-lts Apr 20, 2023
yiguolei added a commit to yiguolei/incubator-doris that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2023
yiguolei added a commit to yiguolei/incubator-doris that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2023
morningman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2023
yiguolei added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2023
gnehil pushed a commit to gnehil/doris that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2023
xiaokang pushed a commit to xiaokang/doris that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2023
Reminiscent pushed a commit to Reminiscent/doris that referenced this pull request May 15, 2023
mongo360 pushed a commit to mongo360/doris that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants