Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add deferrable param in SageMakerTransformOperator #31063

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2023

Conversation

pankajkoti
Copy link
Member

This will allow running SageMakerTransformOperator in an async
fashion meaning that we only submit a job from the worker to run a
job and then defer to the trigger for polling to wait for the job status
to reach a terminal state. This way, the worker slot won't be occupied
for the whole period of task execution.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:providers provider:amazon AWS/Amazon - related issues labels May 4, 2023
@pankajkoti pankajkoti force-pushed the async-sagemaker-transform-operator branch from 6cb9dc7 to 0630aa3 Compare May 4, 2023 15:14
This will allow running SageMakerTransformOperator in an async
fashion meaning that we only submit a job from the worker to
run a job and then defer to the trigger for polling to wait for
the job status reaching a terminal state. This way, the worker
slot won't be occupied for the whole period of task execution.
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 4c9b5fe into apache:main May 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:providers provider:amazon AWS/Amazon - related issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants