4480MB split creates 4.7GB files under Mac OS 10.12.5

[rcosgrove]

Keka: v 1.0.9 (1756)
OS: Mac 10.12.5

When I used Keka to create a 7zip archive, using the pre-set 4480MB split option, it created a 4.7GB file that OS X reported as being too large to burn to DVD or disc images.

[aonez]

The result file is 4.700.372.992 bytes?

[aonez]

DVD+R and DVD+R are set to this size. I'm seeing that DVD- has lees space at 4.700.000.000 and 4.700.307.456. Are you using a DVD- device?

I'll adjust the size to 4.700.000.000 so it's compatible with all devices.

Some sizes: http://www.osta.org/technology/dvdqa/dvdqa6.htm

[rcosgrove]

The result file is 4.700.372.992 bytes?

Yes, according to Pathfinder

Are you using a *DVD-* device?

No. I'm using an Apple Superdrive, which uses DVD±RW (±R DL), and "4.7GB" DVD+R discs. And I used Burn v 2.5.1 (24) to create the DVDs.

I'll adjust the size to *4.700.000.000*

Thanks. As a workaround, I split the archive into CD-sized files, and burnt those to DVDs. - Richard

…

-- Richard Cosgrove

On 1 July 2017 at 13:55, aONe ***@***.***> wrote: *DVD+R* and *DVD+R* are set to this size. I'm seeing that *DVD-* has lees space at 4.700.000.000 and 4.700.307.456. Are you using a *DVD-* device? I'll adjust the size to *4.700.000.000* so it's compatible with all devices. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#49 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABpzLlD1qgQQDHnAgfDOauv0Ux_N8JuFks5sJkHYgaJpZM4OLTNf> .

[aonez]

Meanwhile you can set the split to custom 4.7g. As soon as I have access to a Mac with superdrive I'll test that issue with Burn (by the way my defecto burner since I own a Mac).

[aonez]

I'll set the fixed size to 4698500000 bytes so a 4.7 DVD will have at least 1.5 MB "free".

[aonez]

Next version 1.0.11 will have a quick fix of that. A better implementation will come in version 1.1.0.

[rcosgrove]

Great. Thank you for working on a fix so quickly.

…

-- Richard Cosgrove

On 5 July 2017 at 12:55, aONe ***@***.***> wrote: Next revision 1.0.11 will have a quick fix of that. A better implementation will come in 1.1.0 revision. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#49 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABpzLplnMIUAp9gXo_M4qbbx1bw31Vymks5sK3mlgaJpZM4OLTNf> .