Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scheduler: earlier fee check on receive #4865

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

apfitzge
Copy link

@apfitzge apfitzge commented Feb 7, 2025

Problem

  • better to validate earlier

Summary of Changes

  • add fee-check on ingest

Fixes #

@apfitzge apfitzge added the v2.1 Backport to v2.1 branch label Feb 7, 2025
Copy link

mergify bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Backports to the beta branch are to be avoided unless absolutely necessary for fixing bugs, security issues, and perf regressions. Changes intended for backport should be structured such that a minimum effective diff can be committed separately from any refactoring, plumbing, cleanup, etc that are not strictly necessary to achieve the goal. Any of the latter should go only into master and ride the normal stabilization schedule. Exceptions include CI/metrics changes, CLI improvements and documentation updates on a case by case basis.

@apfitzge apfitzge marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2025 23:06
.filter(|((((_, tx), _), _), _)| {
Consumer::check_fee_payer_unlocked(&working_bank, tx, &mut error_counts)
.is_ok()
})

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like check_fee_payer_unlocked() is called at the end of filtering process, just to clarify that this PR does not result making additional calls of check_fee_payer_unlocked (to packets would be dropped before scheduler_controller calls it again).

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, do we still need to check fee payer in same frequency at scheduler_controller (and unprocessed_transaction_storage)?

@apfitzge apfitzge merged commit 81d19c0 into anza-xyz:master Feb 10, 2025
67 checks passed
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
(cherry picked from commit 81d19c0)

# Conflicts:
#	core/src/banking_stage/transaction_scheduler/receive_and_buffer.rs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
v2.1 Backport to v2.1 branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants